Skip to content
Email:
advocatesurbhikumari@gmail.com

surbhikumari.com

"An advocate must carry both the constitution in his pocket and compassion in his heart."

Phone:
+91 9879691379
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

Tag: important case law

An overview of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA)

No Comments
| HINDU LAW

Introduction The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is a historic legislation that sets the legal provisions for marriage among Hindus in India. This Act was enacted by the Indian Parliament and was a departure from the traditional and customary approaches to marriage that dominated Hindu culture for many generations. It was undertaken during the post-independence process of legal […]

Read More »

Case analysis: Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Shri Vardhichand & Ors. (1980) | Environmental Pollution in details

No Comments
| Bihar Judiciary, judiciary, legal knowledge

The case Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Shri Vardhichand & Ors. (1980 AIR 1622, 1980 SCR (1) 97) is a landmark judgment in Indian environmental law. It played a crucial role in shaping the judiciary’s approach towards public nuisance and environmental pollution and clarified the duties of municipalities under law. The petition arose from the inaction […]

Read More »

Important key points about Tort (a foundational concept in civil law):

No Comments
| Bihar Judiciary, legal knowledge

🔑 Key Points of Tort Law 1. Definition of Tort A tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy in the form of damages (compensation). It occurs when someone’s action or omission causes harm or injury to another person’s body, property, reputation, or legal rights. Tort law comes from common law […]

Read More »

Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala & Anr.(AIR 1973 )SC

No Comments
| All India Bar Council Exam, Bihar Judiciary

Case Name: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala & Anr.Citation: AIR 1973 SC 1461Date of Judgment: April 24, 1973Bench: 13 Judges (largest ever in Indian history)Verdict: 7:6 Majority 🕰️ Background: During the case, Parliament passed the 24th, 25th, and 29th Amendments—giving itself more power to amend the Constitution and protect land reforms. Petitioner: Swami Kesavananda […]

Read More »

I.C Golaknath & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anrs.(AIR1967) SC

No Comments
| All India Bar Council Exam, Bihar Judiciary

🧑‍⚖️ Case Name: I.C. Golaknath & Ors. vs State of Punjab & Anrs.Citation: AIR 1967 SC 1643Date of Judgment: February 27, 1967Bench: 11 Judges of the Supreme CourtMajority: 6:5 verdict 🧑‍🏫 Background: The real issue was whether Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights. ⚖️ Legal Issues: 📜 Arguments by Golaknath (Petitioners): 📜 Arguments by the State […]

Read More »

Case Analysis – Isha Tyagi Vs. State of U.P.(2014,ALR61)

No Comments
| All India Bar Council Exam, Bihar Judiciary

Case Name Isha Tyagi Vs. State of U.P.  Equivalent Citation 2014(107) ALR 61 Date of Judgement 26th August 2014 Court In the High Court of Allahabad Case Number Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 41279 of 2014 Case Type Civil Misc. Writ Petition Petitioner(s) Isha Tyagi Respondent(s) State of U.P. and 3 others. Bench (Division) D.Y. Chandrachud, […]

Read More »

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024

Meta

  • Log in

surbhikumari.com 2025 . Powered by WordPress