Skip to content
Email:
advocatesurbhikumari@gmail.com

surbhikumari.com

"An advocate must carry both the constitution in his pocket and compassion in his heart."

Phone:
+91 9879691379
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

Tag: case law

M/S Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr. (2025)

No Comments
| case analysis

The Supreme Court’s 2025 judgment in M/S Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr. resolved critical ambiguities surrounding Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which mandates pre-institution mediation for commercial disputes. The ruling clarified the mandatory nature of mediation, prospective application of precedent, and equitable remedies for legacy cases, marking a watershed moment […]

Read More »

Kaustubh Khera v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others (2025)

No Comments
| case analysis

Case Title: Kaustubh Khera v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Citation: 2025:MPHC-JBP:21455 Bench: Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait & Justice Vivek Jain Date of Judgment: May 7, 2025 This case is now a significant precedent on the scope of judicial review and the rights of probationary judicial officers in India. Background and Facts Kaustubh Khera, appointed as a […]

Read More »

Closure in Labour Law in India

No Comments
| Labour Law

The significance of closure in labour law, as delineated by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, lies in establishing a fair and regulated framework for both employers and workmen. These procedures, demanding prior permission for closure, ensure a thoughtful and consultative approach. By balancing the interests of employers and workmen, these regulations on Closure in Labour […]

Read More »

Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust & Anr. v. U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. (2025) | Public Trust Doctrine in Land Allotment Case

No Comments
| case analysis

The Supreme Court of India upheld the cancellation of an industrial land allotment originally granted to the Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust (KNMT) by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC). The judgment is a strong reaffirmation of contractual obligations, procedural propriety, and the Public Trust Doctrine in matters of public resource allocation. Case Title: Kamla […]

Read More »

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper & Ors. [RC Cooper] v. Union of India

No Comments
| case analysis

The case of Rustom Cavasjee Cooper & Ors. v. Union of India (1970) is a landmark judgement delivered by the Supreme Court of India, dealing with the constitutional validity of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1969. This Act was passed to nationalise fourteen commercial banks in India, and the petitioners, led by Rustom […]

Read More »

Krishna Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

No Comments
| constitutional law

Introduction The case of Krishna Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2017) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of India that clarified the constitutional limits on the power of the President and Governors to promulgate ordinances under Articles 123 and 213 of the Indian Constitution. The judgement specifically addressed the issues […]

Read More »

The Age of Consent Act, 1891

No Comments
| HINDU LAW, legal knowledge

The Age of Consent Act, 1891 (Act X of 1891) represents a crucial turning point in the history of legal reform in colonial India. This legislation, introduced during British rule, raised the age of consent for sexual intercourse within marriage or outside it from ten to twelve years, bringing the issue of child marriage and […]

Read More »

Ocular Evidence vs. Medical Evidence in the context of Indian law:

No Comments
| judiciary

Introduction Despite the mismatch between medical evidence and ocular evidence, the Supreme Court didn’t set aside the murder conviction. Surprising and strange, right? Not really. We are talking about the case of Sri Halesh vs. the State of Karnataka (2024) Let us understand them in depth to understand the reasons behind the court’s decision. What is ocular evidence? […]

Read More »

Case analysis: Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Shri Vardhichand & Ors. (1980) | Environmental Pollution in details

No Comments
| Bihar Judiciary, judiciary, legal knowledge

The case Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Shri Vardhichand & Ors. (1980 AIR 1622, 1980 SCR (1) 97) is a landmark judgment in Indian environmental law. It played a crucial role in shaping the judiciary’s approach towards public nuisance and environmental pollution and clarified the duties of municipalities under law. The petition arose from the inaction […]

Read More »

Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala & Anr.(AIR 1973 )SC

No Comments
| All India Bar Council Exam, Bihar Judiciary

Case Name: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala & Anr.Citation: AIR 1973 SC 1461Date of Judgment: April 24, 1973Bench: 13 Judges (largest ever in Indian history)Verdict: 7:6 Majority 🕰️ Background: During the case, Parliament passed the 24th, 25th, and 29th Amendments—giving itself more power to amend the Constitution and protect land reforms. Petitioner: Swami Kesavananda […]

Read More »

Posts navigation

1 2 Next

Archives

  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024

Meta

  • Log in

surbhikumari.com 2025 . Powered by WordPress